{"id":2548,"date":"2005-05-31T21:27:13","date_gmt":"2005-06-01T05:27:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.soulhuntre.com\/items\/date\/2005\/05\/31\/dont-let-logic-keep-you-down\/"},"modified":"2005-05-31T21:27:13","modified_gmt":"2005-06-01T05:27:13","slug":"dont-let-logic-keep-you-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/2005\/05\/31\/dont-let-logic-keep-you-down\/","title":{"rendered":"don’t let logic keep you down!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n
\"6pk_day3__0033\"<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\"6pk_day3__0041\"<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6 pack!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\n

"Observe that the philosophical system based on the axiom of the
\n\tprimacy of existence (i.e., on recognizing the absolutism of reality) led to
\n\tthe recognition of man’s identity and rights. But the philosophical systems
\n\tbased on the primacy of consciousness (i.e., on the seemingly megalomaniacal
\n\tnotion that nature is whatever man wants it to be) led to the view that man
\n\tpossesses no identity, that he is infinitely flexible, malleable, usable,
\n\tand disposable. Ask yourself why." – Ayn Rand, "The Metaphysical vs. the
\n\tMan-Made"<\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

ed note: for your viewing pleasure I have added some eye candy.<\/i><\/p>\n

This post is prompted by a great series of editorials from the
\nifeminists.net<\/a> website on this and
\nsimilar topics, go look them over (links at end of article).<\/p>\n

I have mentioned before that the critical problem with radical feminism is
\nthat it is based purely on feelings, not logic. It allows for how on perceives
\nthe world to be paramount, not what is<\/i><\/b> in the world. Look at what
\nthey espouse and you can see it. <\/p>\n