{"id":3182,"date":"2008-07-03T19:12:20","date_gmt":"2008-07-03T23:12:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.soulhuntre.com\/2008\/07\/03\/july-4th-dissent-criticism-pride-guns-and-freedom\/"},"modified":"2008-07-03T19:12:20","modified_gmt":"2008-07-03T23:12:20","slug":"july-4th-dissent-criticism-pride-guns-and-freedom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/2008\/07\/03\/july-4th-dissent-criticism-pride-guns-and-freedom\/","title":{"rendered":"July 4th – Dissent, criticism, pride, guns and freedom"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n

Note: This post is also on Herdwatching<\/a>.<\/p>\n

As I write this it it July 03, 2008. This post is not a long, coherent essay but rather the expression of a number of thoughts that have been swirling for a few weeks\u2026 brought to a point by a piece of writing<\/a> by Chris Satullo over at the Philadelphia Inquirer. Understand me clearly\u2026 I agree with the founding fathers about dissent and disagreement. My point is not that Chris should remain quiet.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Disagreement with the government and the course of the nation is the right of every U.S. citizen and so deeply ingrained in our national character that our founders considered it the first<\/em><\/strong> thing they had to remind us of. The first amendment grants us the freedom to not only disagree, but to attempt to persuade others to join us in that dissent via our ideas and our reason.<\/p>\n

This freedom was considered so critical that to safeguard it the second<\/em><\/strong> thing they did was ensure that we had the right to arm ourselves so that we can never be truly silenced, and so that no one could attempt to persuade us by force instead of reason.<\/p>\n

I am heartened beyond words<\/em> that at a time when so many people are screaming loud and long that our rights have been removed the highest court in our nation issued a strong decision supporting that second amendment right to keep and bear arms. They not only supported it, they did so for exactly the right reason \u2013 in recognition of the critical role an individually armed populace plays as a check against rampant abuse of power.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ll say it again. I consider the right to dissent an essential freedom and a core American value. However that does not mean that all dissent is inherently valuable, or that reflexive dismissal of all that is amazing about this nation is inherently right and good.<\/p>\n

We see the same thing happening in the conspiracy community. Since a mark of intelligence is asking questions then they are always at a loss that their penchant for asking stupid questions and ignoring the answers is not considered a sign of intelligence. They confuse the effect (questions) with the cause (intelligence). Dissent and criticism is the same way. Yes, many intelligent people dissent. It is not, however, true that all dissent is the result of intelligence.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

To be fair, Chris is better than most. Chris is taking on important issues\u2026 I just think he misses the obvious in his analysis. Chris feels that if at any given single moment in time the U.S. isn\u2019t operating perfectly to our ideals that it indicates a catastrophic failure of our nation and those who are part of it. <\/p>\n

I disagree.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

To me, the pride of the U.S.A. is that we have a system that corrects<\/em><\/strong>. We are a nation of humans, lead by humans, dealing with other humans in a complex world. We will make mistakes, we will occasionally loose our way and we will sometimes have to do seem things we are less than thrilled with to survive. Yet we always correct because the core of this nation is self correcting. There is no need for despair and there is no need to run around screaming. The system is in place \u2013 all you have to do is use it. Act. Speak. Persuade. Set an example.<\/p>\n

Think about what even reading this missive of mine actually means:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n