{"id":3261,"date":"2008-08-04T18:47:48","date_gmt":"2008-08-04T22:47:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.soulhuntre.com\/2008\/08\/04\/freedom-is-good-no-really-i-mean-it\/"},"modified":"2008-08-04T18:47:48","modified_gmt":"2008-08-04T22:47:48","slug":"freedom-is-good-no-really-i-mean-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/2008\/08\/04\/freedom-is-good-no-really-i-mean-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Freedom is good. No really, I mean it."},"content":{"rendered":"

I just posted this on a fetish website where the usual panicked discussions were going on about censoring discussion of certain fetishes. Predictably, while not one of the fetishes in question involved child molestation it showed up as the scary monster under the bed as it always does when someone wants you to back down from your support of free thought.<\/p>\n

Here was my reply\u2026<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

(ed note: I made a few minor textual changes on re-read to remove some course language and clarify one sentence\u2026 this post will be on the web forever and neither a misunderstanding or an obscenity is needed to make my point)<\/em><\/p>\n

Here is where the rubber of freedom hits the road of panic and the desire of some to criminalize the thoughts of others. <\/p>\n

I will be very, very clear. I absolutely object to any attempt to criminalize thoughts and fantasies regardless of their content. That includes molesting kids, murdering nuns, killing baby seals, blowing up a tall building or bringing down a nation.<\/p>\n

Criminalizing actions that specifically violate the rights of others? That I support. As applied to the panic button topic of child molestation that means I reject the criminalization of art, communication or erotica about the topic but I absolutely support the criminalization of an adult having sex with a child.<\/p>\n

See the line? Crimes are things that happen in REALITY. Things that happen in fantasy I do not support criminalizing.<\/p>\n

The supreme court I might add is not at all convinced that criminalizing fantasy is a good idea either. Many of the challenges to the overly broad and repeatedly struck down "Child Online Protection Act" are on just this issue.<\/p>\n

One of the interesting things about this discussion (and in fact any discussion involving the defense of freedom even in unpopular extremes) is that it almost always follows a pattern…<\/p>\n