{"id":50943,"date":"2003-02-28T17:27:47","date_gmt":"2003-02-28T17:27:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.soulhuntre.com\/items\/date\/2003\/02\/28\/ripples-from-davos\/"},"modified":"2003-02-28T17:27:47","modified_gmt":"2003-02-28T17:27:47","slug":"ripples-from-davos-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/2003\/02\/28\/ripples-from-davos-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ripples from Davos\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n <\/p>\n Anyway, the story apparently goes like this:<\/p>\n From here on, the exact order is hard to keep track of, so I’ll just list the My thoughts on the topic of email privacy are simple. I fully believe that I Some examples<\/u>:<\/p>\n I have copied the original email here since it looks like some places Hi Guys.<\/p>\n OK, hard to believe, but true. Yours truely has been hobnobbing with the I spent a week in Davos, Switzerland at the World Economic Forum. I was Davos, I discovered, is a breathtakingly beautiful spot, unlike anything Local Davos folks are fanatic about skiing, and the slopes are literally This sweet little chalet village was during the WEF packed with about Antiglobalization folks didn’t stand a chance. Nor did Al Qaeda. After Overall, here is what I learned about the state of our world:<\/p>\n – I was in a dinner with heads of Saudi and German FBI, plus the – But Al Qaeda, they say, is like a brand which has been heavily – The global economy is in very very very very bad shape. Last year – If the U.S. unilaterally goes to war, and it is anything short of a – Not surprisingly, the business community was in no mood to hear about – Plenty are also infuriated because they disagree on policy grounds. I – If Al Qaeda is down to merely 200 terrorists cadres and a – The Middle East situation has never been worse. All hope for a – Serious Islamic leaders (e.g. the King of Jordan, the Prime – US unilateralism is seen as arrogant, bullyish. If the U.S. – For a minority of the participants there was another layer of – When Colin Powell gave the speech of his life, trying to win I learned that the only economy about which there is much enthusiasm is I learned that the US economy is the primary drag on the global economy, The WEF was overwhelmed by talk of security, with fears of terrorism, I learned from American security and military speakers that, "We need The mood was very grim. Almost no parties, little fun. If it hadn’t been These WEF folks are freaked out. They see very bad economics ahead, war, Finally, who are these guys? I actually enjoyed a lot of my The world isn’t run by a clever cabal. It’s run by about 5,000 Welcome to Earth: meet the leaders.<\/p>\n Ciao, And the reply she passed on in response…<\/p>\n My name is Laurie Garrett.<\/p>\n I am astounded by what I\u2019ve read here.<\/p>\n A few days ago I received an e-mail from a stranger, who asked if I was the author of a letter from Davos, regarding the World Economic Forum. The e-mailer implied that the letter was a hoax, and directed me to this URL.<\/p>\n Though I did, indeed, attend the WEF and wrote a personal letter afterwards to a handful of friends, I never typed a word that was meant for public consumption.<\/p>\n That is what I told the stranger. And then I went back to work, covering the latest sad news from the trenches of the war on HIV.<\/p>\n \n Let me as clear as possible about this: The letter you are all clamoring over, parsing, deriding and fantasizing about was a personal note. It is a private letter that someone among my friends thoughtlessly, yet I am sure without any malice, forwarded to a couple of people who are strangers to me. And they, in turn, passed it on to more strangers, and so on. Now, to my deep embarrassment, and acute sense of invaded privacy, all of you\u2014 thousands of strangers\u2014are dissecting my personal letter. I would never have written for public consumption in such a sloppy, candid, opinionated flip tone. This was never intended for your eyes.<\/p>\n I want you, please, to imagine something. It\u2019s 1979. I penned, in longhand, a letter to a friend describing my rather individual, admittedly biased take on attending the SALT II talks between Carter and Brezhnev. I placed that letter in an enveloped, sealed it, stamped it and posted it to my pal. (So far, I am recounting an event that actually occurred when, in my post-adolescence, I covered the Vienna Summit.)<\/p>\n Now, imagine my recipient found the letter amusing or insightful and photocopied my handwritten note, posting it to ten friends. And so on. Snail mail hell? Doubtful. In those seemingly ancient days we all respected privacy, and the time and money required to photocopy and post missives prompted all of us to pause and question whether we had a right to forward a personal letter without the author\u2019s permission.<\/p>\n But in 2003 few of us pen letters anymore, and the number of seconds it takes to forward an e-mail to a dozen people is too few for ethical reflection. We have erased privacy. And, remarkably, we have all come to believe that it is our right ? our privilege ? to read and analyze the personal musings of complete strangers. We don\u2019t want the government reading our mail, but we se no problem with reading other citizens\u2019 letters.<\/p>\n This saddens me deeply, and I have learned a sorry lesson. I shall no longer deliver such personal musings to friends and confidantes via the Internet. No one can be trusted in this CLICK-FORWARD electronic world.<\/p>\n But well outstripping the angst I feel over the loss of my personal privacy is my despair over your responses to the note. As I scanned the correspondence on this URL I found myself imagining tens of thousands of reasonably intelligent, energetic souls wasting precious moments of their lives n collective brainpower over n extraordinarily silly exercise. I saw an enormous web of cross-referencing and communication herein\u2014of wasted \u201ccommunity\u201d.<\/p>\n Ten years ago, before the Great Dot Com Crash, Silicon Valley pundits waxed eloquent about the great \u201ccommunity\u201d of the internet, and the \u201cnew global democracy\u201d it represented. But People, this is a fraud. Do you imagine for a moment that the participants in the WEF\u2014whether they be the CEOs of Amoco an IBM of the leaders of Amnesty International and OXFAM\u2014waste their time with Internet chat rooms and discussions such as this? Do you actually believe, as you type your random thoughts in such Internet settings, that you are participating in Civilization? In Democracy? In changing your world?<\/p>\n I beg of all of you\u2014the Internet addicts of the world\u2014to turn off your TVs and computers now and then and engage the world. Go have actual eye-to-eye conversations with your family, friends and neighbors. Read a great book. Argue politics over dinner with friends. Go to City Council meeting. Raise money for your local public library. Teach your 12-year-old algebra.<\/p>\n Climb a mountain.<\/p>\n Execute a dream.<\/p>\n Be a citizen of the real world.<\/p>\n As I read through the electronic conversation on this URL I was reminded of documentary I saw years ago about \u201cStar Trek\u201d fans. In it, William Shatner (AKA Captain Kirk) stood before hundreds of people dressed as Klingons, Vulcans, Romulans and assorted other imagined aliens. Somewhat bemused, Shatner looked at the sea of masked and oddly dressed humans and said, \u201cPeople, I have only one thing to say to you: Get a life!\u201d<\/p>\n Please.<\/p>\n Laurie Garrett (www.lauriegarrett.com)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This is an interesting situation for a number of reasons. It brings up all sorts of issues, from the ultra wealthy to global economics, pithy commentary and how private email spreads itself around the world. All very amusing, and something to think about. More importantly maybe, the spread of this discussion and the original information […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":53207,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"aside","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[278],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50943"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50943"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50943\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/53207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/legacyiamsenseiken.local\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThis is an interesting situation<\/a> for a number of reasons. It brings up all
\nsorts of issues, from the ultra wealthy to global economics, pithy commentary
\nand how private email spreads itself around the world. All very amusing, and
\nsomething to think about. More importantly maybe, the spread of this discussion
\nand the original information is a good way to look at how self referential the
\nemerging free flowing information web is – and how it can also spread
\ninformation. There is lots<\/i><\/b> more so follow along…<\/p>\n\n
\n attends the [[wp:World_Economic_Forum|WEF]] at [[wp:Davos]] and sends off an
\n ‘informal’ email to a few people… how many is unknown.<\/li>\n
\n
\n Topica list<\/a> discussing [[wp:psychohistory]] in a post by Adam Davis a
\n ‘friend of a friend’ separation from Laurie. The link to the
\n
\n specific message<\/a> may be broken by now.<\/li>\n
\n
\n finds it’s way to MetaFilter<\/a>.<\/li>\n
\n
\n responds angrily to the MeFi thread<\/a> in an email to ‘beagle<\/a>‘.<\/li>\n
\nplaces you can continue gathering information or participating in discussion.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n analysis of the situation<\/a> showed up on
\n Lawmeme<\/a>,
\n penned by
\n
\n grimmelm, a MeFi user<\/a>.<\/li>\n
\n Bruce Sterling<\/a> penned
\n
\n an interesting ‘Viridian Note’ on the whole thing<\/a>, including line by line
\n commentary on the original email by Laurie.<\/li>\n
\n
\n MetaTalk thread<\/a> starts up, talking about all of the above.<\/li>\n
\n Slashdot gets in on the act<\/a> with it’s own posting on the topic.<\/li>\n
\n
\n interesting entry on d-log<\/a> is a longer response by someone who was quoted
\n in the
\n
\n Lawmeme article<\/a>.<\/li>\n
\n
\n article on massive that discusses the MeFi discussion<\/a>.<\/li>\n
\n Corante mentioned it<\/a>, but the only link I have seems to have become
\n inaccurate.<\/li>\n
\n
\n has experienced this before<\/a>, and now has a whole section of her website
\n devoted tot he last time something like this happened.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nhave the right to expect email sent in confidence to remain confidential. I also
\nrealize that the odds that that will actually happen negatively impacted as the
\nnumber of people who I send it to grows.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n privacy<\/b> even in situations where as a practical matter I probably won’t
\n get it. Nothing in this post is intended as a waiver of my expectation of
\n privacy \ud83d\ude42<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n\n
\n "leak".<\/li>\n
\n remain private.<\/li>\n
\n I do not have ironclad trust with then I won’t be too shocked to find it
\n slipped out from someone.<\/li>\n
\n I do not really believe that it won’t ever get forwarded, leaked or posted
\n someplace else.<\/li>\n
\n control, I do not really expect it won’t ever show up someplace else.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n
\nare taking it down. I did NOT correct the spelling, though I did re-format it a
\nbit.<\/p>\n
\n\n
\nruling class.<\/p>\n
\nawarded a special pass which allowed me full access to not only the
\nentire official meeting, but also private dinners with the likes the
\nhead of the Saudi Secret Police, presidents of various insundry
\ncountries, your Fortune 500 CEOS and the leaders of the most important
\nNGOs in the world. This was not typical press access. It was full-on,
\nunfettered, class A hobnobbing.<\/p>\n
\nI’d ever experienced. Nestled high in the Swiss Alps, it’s a three hours
\ntrain ride from Zurich that finds you climbing steadily through
\nsnow-laden mountains that bring to mind Heidi and Audrey Hepburn (as in
\nthe opening scenes of "Charade"). The EXTREMELY powerful arrive by
\nhelicopter. The moderately powerful take the first class train. The NGOs
\nand we mere mortals reach heaven via coach train or a conference bus.
\nOnce in Europe’s bit of heaven conferees are scattered in hotels that
\nrange from B&B to ultra luxury 5-stars, all of which are located along
\none of only three streets that bisect the idyllic village of some 13,000
\npermanent residents.<\/p>\n
\na 5-15 minute bus ride away, depending on which astounding downhill you
\ncare to try. I don’t know how, so rather than come home in a full body
\ncast I merely watched.<\/p>\n
\n3000 delegates and press, some 1000 Swiss police, another 400 Swiss
\nsoldiers, numerous tanks and armored personnel carriers, gigantic rolls
\nof coiled barbed wire that gracefully cascaded down snow-covered
\nhillsides, missile launchers and assorted other tools of the national
\nsecurity trade. The security precautions did not, of course, stop there.
\nEvery single person who planned to enter the conference site had special
\nelectronic badges which, upon being swiped across a reading pad,
\nproduced a computer screen filled color portrait of the attendee, along
\nwith his\/her vital statistics. These were swiped and scrutinized by
\nsoldiers and police every few minutes — any time one passed through a
\ndoor, basically. The whole system was connected to handheld wireless
\ncommunication devices made by HP, which were issued to all VIPs. I got
\none. Very cool, except when they crashed. Which, of course, they did
\nfrequently. These devices supplied every imagineable piece of
\ninformation one could want about the conference, your fellow delegates,
\nDavos, the world news, etc. And they were emailing devices — all
\nemails being monitored, of course, by Swiss cops.<\/p>\n
\nall, if someone managed to take out Davos during WEF week the world
\nwould basically lose a fair chunk of its ruling and governing class
\nPOOF, just like that. So security was the name of the game. Metal
\ndetectors, X-ray machines, shivering soldiers standing in blizzards,
\netc.<\/p>\n
\nforeign minister of Afghanistan. They all said that at its peak Al Qaeda
\nhad 70,000 members. Only 10% of them were trained in terrorism — the
\nrest were military recruits. Of that 7000, they say all but about 200
\nare dead or in jail.<\/p>\n
\nfranchised. And nobody knows how many unofficial franchises have been
\nspawned since 9\/11.<\/p>\n
\nwhen WEF met here in New York all I heard was, "Yeah, it’s bad, but
\nrecovery is right around the corner". This year "recovery" was a word
\nnever uttered. Fear was palpable — fear of enormous fiscal hysteria.
\nThe watchwords were "deflation", "long term stagnation" and "collapse of
\nthe dollar". All of this is without war.<\/p>\n
\nquick surgical strike (lasting less than 30 days), the economists were
\nall predicting extreme economic gloom: falling dollar value, rising spot
\nmarket oil prices, the Fed pushing interest rates down towards zero with
\nresulting increase in national debt, severe trouble in all countries
\nwhose currency is guaranteed agains the dollar (which is just about
\neverybody except the EU), a near cessation of all development and
\nhumanitarian programs for poor countries. Very few economists or
\nministers of finance predicted the world getting out of that economic
\nfunk for minimally five-10 years, once the downward spiral ensues.<\/p>\n
\na war in Iraq. Except for diehard American Republicans, a few Brit
\nTories and some Middle East folks the WEF was in a foul, angry
\nanti-American mood. Last year the WEF was a lovefest for America. This
\nyear the mood was so ugly that it reminded me of what it felt like to be
\nan American overseas in the Reagan years. The rich — whether they are
\nFrench or Chinese or just about anybody — are livid about the Iraq
\ncrisis primarily because they believe it will sink their financial
\nfortunes.<\/p>\n
\nlearned a great deal. It goes FAR beyond the sorts of questions one
\nhears raised by demonstrators and in UN debates. For example:<\/p>\n
\nhandful of wannabe franchises, what’s all the fuss?<\/p>\n
\nsettlement between Israel and Palestine seems to have evaporated. The
\nenergy should be focused on placing painful financial pressure on all
\nsides in that fight, forcing them to the negotiating table. Otherwise,
\nthe ME may well explode. The war in Iraq is at best a distraction from
\nthat core issue, at worst may aggravate it. Jordan’s Queen Rania spoke
\nof the "desperate search for hope".<\/p>\n
\nMinster of Malaysia, the Grand Mufti of Bosnia) believe that the Islamic
\nworld must recapture the glory days of 12-13th C Islam. That means
\nfinding tolerance and building great education institutions and places
\nof learning. The King was passionate on the subject. It also means
\nfreedom of movement and speech within and among the Islamic nations.
\nAnd, most importantly to the WEF, it means flourishing free trade and
\nsupport for entrepeneurs with minimal state regulation. (However, there
\nwere also several Middle East respresentatives who argued precisely the
\nopposite. They believe bringing down Saddam Hussein and then pushing the
\nIsrael\/Palestine issue could actually result in a Golden Age for Arab
\nIslam.)<\/p>\n
\ncannot behave in partnership with its allies — especially the Europeans
\n— it risks not only political alliance but BUSINESS, as well. Company
\nleaders argued that they would rather not have to deal with US
\ngovernment attitudes about all sorts of multilateral treaties (climate
\nchange, intellectual property, rights of children, etc.) — it’s easier
\nto just do business in countries whose governments agree with yours. And
\nit’s cheaper, in the long run, because the regulatory envornments match.
\nWar against Iraq is seen as just another example of the unilateralism.<\/p>\n
\nAntiAmericanism that focused on moralisms and religion. I often heard
\ndelegates complain that the US "opposes the rights of children", because
\nwe block all treaties and UN efforts that would support sex education
\nand condom access for children and teens. They spoke of sex education as
\na "right". Similarly, there was a decidedly mixed feeling about
\nAshcroft, who addressed the conference. I attended a small lunch with
\nAshcroft, and observed Ralph Reed and other prominent Christian
\nfundamentalists working the room and bowing their heads before eating.
\nThe rest of the world’s elite finds this American Christian behavior at
\nleast as uncomfortable as it does Moslem or Hindu fundamentalist
\nbehavior. They find it awkward every time a US representative refers to
\n"faith-based" programs. It’s different from how it makes non-Christian
\nAmericans feel — these folks experience it as downright embarrassing.<\/p>\n
\nover the nonAmerican delegates, the sharpest attack on his comments came
\nnot from Amnesty International or some Islamic representative — it came
\nfrom the head of the largest bank in the Netherlands!<\/p>\n
\nChina, which was responsible for 77% of the global GDP growth in 2002.
\nBut the honcho of the Bank of China, Zhu Min, said that fantastic growth
\ncould slow to a crawl if China cannot solve its rural\/urban problem.
\nCurrently 400 million Chinese are urbanites, and their average income is
\n16 times that of the 900 million rural residents. Zhu argued China must
\nurbanize nearly a billion people in ten years!<\/p>\n
\nand only a handful of nations have sufficient internal growth to thrive
\nwhen the US is stagnating.<\/p>\n
\ncomputer and copyright theft, assassination and global instability
\ndominating almost every discussion.<\/p>\n
\nto attack Iraq not to punish it for what it might have, but
\npreemptively, as part of a global war. Iraq is just one piece of a
\ncampaign that will last years, taking out states, cleansing the planet."<\/p>\n
\nfor the South Africans — party animals every one of them — I’d never
\nhave danced. Thankfully, the South Africans staged a helluva party, with
\nJimmy Dludlu’s band rocking until 3am and Stellenbosch wines pouring
\nfreely, glass after glass after glass….<\/p>\n
\nand more terrorism. About 10% of the sessions were about terrorism, and
\nit’s heavy stuff. One session costed out what another 9\/11-type attack
\nwould do to global markets, predicting a far, far worse impact due to
\nthe "second hit" effect — a second hit that would prove all the world’s
\npost-9\/11 security efforts had failed. Another costed out in detail what
\nthis, or that, war scenario would do to spot oil prices. Russian speakers argued
\nthat "failed
\nnations" were spawning terrorists — code for saying, "we hate
\nChechnya". Entire sessions were devoted to arguing which poses the
\ngreater asymmetric threat: nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.<\/p>\n
\nconversations, and found many of the leaders and rich quite charming and
\nremarkably candid. Some dressed elegantly, no matter how bitter cold and
\nsnowy it was, but most seemed quite happy in ski clothes or casual
\nattire. Women wearing pants was perfectly acceptable, and the elite is
\nsufficiently multicultural that even the suit and tie lacks a sense of
\ndominance.
\nWatching Bill Clinton address the conference while sitting in the hotel
\nroom of the President of Mozambique — we were viewing it on closed
\ncircuit TV — I got juicy blow-by=blow analysis of US foreign policy
\nfrom a remarkably candid head of state. A day spent with Bill Gates
\nturned out to be fascinating and fun. I found the CEO of Heinekin
\nhilarious, and George Soros proved quite earnest about confronting AIDS.
\nVicente Fox — who I had breakfast with — proved sexy and smart like a
\n— well, a fox. David Stern (Chair of the NBA) ran up and gave me a
\nhug.<\/p>\n
\nbickering, sometimes charming, usually arrogant, mostly male people who
\nare accustomed to living in either phenomenal wealth, or great personal
\npower. A few have both. Many of them turn out to be remarkably naive —
\nespecially about science and technology. All of them are financially
\nwise, though their ranks have thinned due to unwise tech-stock
\ninvesting. They pay close heed to politics, though most would be happy
\nif the global political system behaved far more rationally — better for
\nthe bottom line. They work very hard, attending sessions from dawn to
\nnearly midnight, but expect the standards of intelligence and analysis
\nto be the best available in the entire world. They are impatient. They
\nhave a hard time reconciling long term issues (global wearming, AIDS
\npandemic, resource scarcity) with their daily bottomline foci. They are
\ncomfortable working across languages, cultures and gender, though white
\ncaucasian males still outnumber all other categories. They adore hi-tech
\ngadgets and are glued to their cell phones.<\/p>\n
\nLaurie<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
\n\n
\nYesterday, however, I opened this URL and\u2014with considerable humiliation — read the remarks, paranoid fantasies speculations, derisions, insults and Internet din herein.<\/p>\n